Turn the report into a testable problem.
Extract the affected service, retry path, symptoms, timing, and available evidence without sending the full workspace history.
Why this route: structured extraction, low ambiguityModeus breaks a prompt or task into steps. For each step, the router selects an approved API provider and model based on the work, required quality, modality, policy, speed, and cost.
One task, several routes
Routine extraction can use a focused lower-cost model. Ambiguous diagnosis can use a stronger reasoning model. Tests and tools verify the result.
Extract the affected service, retry path, symptoms, timing, and available evidence without sending the full workspace history.
Why this route: structured extraction, low ambiguityUse repository context, runtime evidence, and relevant Active Memory to compare causal explanations and identify the smallest defensible root cause.
Why this route: ambiguity, code relationships, consequenceWrite the regression test, run the affected suite, and package the evidence with the change instead of asking a model to merely judge its own answer.
Why this route: executable proof is availableRouting signals
It does not assign one model to the entire task just because the task has one category.
Visible decisions
The workspace shows which model class and provider handled a step, what context it received, and why the router selected it.
Distinguish focused, reasoning, code, multimodal, and verification steps.
Understand which files, memories, and task facts shaped a step.
Provider, data, cost, and workflow boundaries remain configuration-dependent.
Bring one high-cost workflow